As I mentioned when writing about acidity, body is one of the four critical elements in tasting wine (flavor, body, acid, tannin). Other words that can be used as synonyms for body are mouthfeel and viscosity.
Descriptors
The body of a wine is generally called light, medium, or full. On the full side of the spectrum, you will sometimes see fun words like unctuous used as well.
Influencing Factors
In general, higher alcohol content leads to fuller body. Similarly, higher residual sugar equates to fuller body.
Evaluation
The best way to evaulate body is to taste the wine, and here is the analogy that I have found most useful:
Light-bodied : Skim milk ::
Medium-bodied : 2% milk ::
Full-bodied : Whole milk ::
Unctuous : Whipping cream
Another method for evaluating body is to swirl the wine in the glass and look at the viscosity of the “legs” or “tears” as it runs down the side of the glass. And this is a nice segue into the next topic:
Ratings (Me)
When I write a tasting note, I frequently reference the body of the wine, but body has absolutely no impact on how I rate a wine. Why? Because body does not equal quality! There is a common misconception that fuller-bodied wines are better wines, such that if you can’t see a wine’s “legs” on the glass, then it is probably cheap plonk. Untrue!
Some varietals are, by their nature, lighter-bodied. Pinot Noir, for example, is typically light-to-medium bodied. Gamay Noir (the grape used to make Beaujolais) is light-bodied. This doesn’t make them lower in quality. In fact, lighter bodied wines can be more subtle, complex, and elegant than their full-throttle cousins.
I suspect that “light” has taken on pejorative connotations, especially in the United States, due to products like these:


In the future, I am going to try to use “delicate” to describe lighter bodies in the hopes of avoiding any unintentional negative biasing.
Ratings (Professionals)
While I don’t rate wines based on body, some professional reviewers do, and their ratings of body are really ratings related to typicity. Typicity is another tricky term that basically means, “does this wine taste like a typical [insert varietal].” So, some reviewers would ding a full-bodied Pinot Noir because it lacks varietal typicity. Of course, that begs the question: who decides what a typical Pinot Noir should taste like? Well, the French of course! (Just kidding. Vive La France!) In reality, each reviewer has his/her own definition of typicity and makes a decision about the shouldiness of each wine (that’s a word I just made up to describe how much a wine tastes like it should; feel free to use it).
Some folks call bullshit on the whole typicity judgement, arguing that it stifles creativity in winemaking and is akin to wine stereotyping. On the other side of the fence, what the hell is the point of making a Pinot Noir that tastes like a Syrah, unless you want to have a gotcha moment during a blind tasting (hmmmm… those can be fun). I guess I come down slightly on the side of those who argue for typicity, but my mind is still open on this topic.

This site is dedicated (mostly) to the wines of Washington state. Hi. I'm Paul Zitarelli. That's me in the picture. I'm the one that's neither female (my wife Kelli) nor feline (our cat Smoke Bomb)...
Recent Comments